Zengineering Sponsored by
Manufacturing Techniques v0.1

Additive Manufacturing

Background information and design guidelines for parts produced by additive manufacturing, covering all major process families: FDM, vat photopolymerisation, powder bed fusion, jetting, directed energy deposition, and sheet lamination.

Info

Document Goal

Goal: Informing engineers of the limitations and guidelines for the design of parts to be produced by additive manufacturing. This document provides designers with background information and guidelines on additive manufacturing. There are two main parts: additive manufacturing background information, and general rules and guidelines.

01

Additive Manufacturing Background Information

Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, creates three-dimensional objects layer by layer. Unlike traditional subtractive methods – turning, milling, grinding and similar – that remove material from a starting shape, AM builds parts only where material is needed.

There are seven primary process categories as defined by ISO/ASTM 52920:

  • Material extrusion (FDM / FFF)
  • Vat Photopolymerization (SLA / DLP)
  • Powder Bed Fusion (SLS / DMLS / SLM / EBM / SHS)
  • Material Jetting
  • Binder Jetting
  • Directed Energy Deposition
  • Sheet Lamination
Additive manufacturing process selection tree
Figure 1 – Additive manufacturing process selection tree (does not include all processes)

The main differences between processes lie in the way layers are deposited and in the materials used. Each method has its own advantages and drawbacks. The jetting processes (Material Jetting, Binder Jetting, and Multi Jet Fusion) are grouped together in this document.

1.1 Material Extrusion (FDM / FFF)

In fused deposition modelling (FDM), also known as fused filament fabrication (FFF), material is drawn through a heated nozzle and deposited layer by layer. The nozzle moves in the horizontal plane while the build platform lowers vertically after each layer. FDM is the most widely used technique and is common on desktop and industrial printers alike.

FDM requires support structures wherever the material is not directly resting on the workpiece or build platform. A more recent variant – fused particle fabrication (FPF), sometimes called fused granular fabrication (FGF) – prints directly from pellets, enabling the use of recycled materials and reducing material cost.

The process of 3D printing directly from pellets to avoid the conversion to filament is called fused particle fabrication (FPF) (or fused granular fabrication (FGF)) and has the potential to use more recycled materials.

FDM 3D printer
Figure 2 – FDM 3D printer
FDM process overview
Figure 3 – FDM process overview

1.2 Vat Photopolymerisation

Vat photopolymerisation uses a vat of liquid, UV-sensitive polymer resin that hardens on exposure to light. The two most common variants, SLA and DLP, are both described below. Because the process builds in liquid, no structural support exists during the build phase and support structures must be added in the same way as for FDM.

Vat photopolymerisation process overview
Figure 4 – Vat photopolymerisation process overview

1.2.1 Stereolithography (SLA)

SLA is the second most widely used 3D printing technique. It produces highly accurate, isotropic and watertight parts with smooth surfaces and fine details. Feature sizes down to 0.1 mm are readily achievable; certain specialised machines can reach 0.02 mm.

An SLA printer selectively exposes liquid resin to a laser beam. The resin cures only where the laser is focused; the remaining liquid is washed away after printing. Resolution in the XY plane depends on the laser spot size (typically 30–140 µm, non-adjustable). Vertical resolution (Z) ranges from 25 to 200 µm – a trade-off between print speed and surface quality. For comparison, a desktop FDM printer typically works at 150–400 µm per layer.

After printing, the part must be washed with ethanol or a similar solvent to remove uncured resin, then UV post-cured to fully harden the material and improve mechanical stability. Two-directional laser exposure is also possible on certain systems, further increasing resolution.

SLA resin 3D printer
Figure 5 – SLA resin 3D printer

1.2.2 Digital Light Processing (DLP)

DLP also falls under vat photopolymerisation. The key difference is the light source: DLP uses a digital projector (Digital Micromirror Device) that flashes an image of the entire layer at once, making it generally faster than SLA for single-part builds.

One drawback of DLP is that output quality decreases when printing multiple parts in a single tray, because the fixed pixel grid is spread over a larger area. SLA, which traces geometry with a focused laser, does not share this limitation.

DLP process overview
Figure 6 – DLP process overview

1.3 Powder Bed Fusion

Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) encompasses several processes that use a laser or electron beam to melt and fuse material powder layer by layer. A roller or blade spreads fresh powder over each completed layer. The surrounding unfused powder acts as a support medium, removing the need for dedicated support structures – a major advantage over FDM and SLA.

PBF step by step:

  1. A layer – typically 0.1 mm – of material powder is spread over the build platform.
  2. A laser (or electron beam) fuses the cross-section of the model in that layer.
  3. A new layer of powder is spread over the previous one.
  4. Subsequent cross-sections are fused and added.
  5. The process repeats until the full model is complete. Loose, unfused powder is removed after the build.

The Powder Bed Fusion process includes the following commonly used printing techniques:
1. Selective laser sintering (SLS)
2. Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)
3. Selective laser melting (SLM)
4. Electron beam melting (EBM)
5. Selective heat sintering (SHS)

SLS 3D print
Figure 7 – SLS 3D print
Powder bed fusion overview
Figure 8 – Powder bed fusion overview

1.3.1 Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) – polymers

SLS machines use a laser to sinter polymer powder layer by layer. The build chamber is held a few degrees below the material melting point, reducing the energy the laser needs to fuse each layer. The chamber is typically filled with nitrogen to limit oxidation and improve part quality. Parts require a cool-down period after the build to achieve high dimensional accuracy.

1.3.2 Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) – metals

DMLS follows the same process as SLS but uses metal powders instead of polymers. A wide range of engineering alloys is available. The powder is sintered layer by layer, producing functional metal parts with good mechanical properties.

1.3.3 Selective Laser Melting (SLM) – metals

SLM is similar to DMLS but fully melts the powder rather than sintering it, typically yielding higher density parts. It generally builds faster than SLS but requires an inert gas atmosphere, has higher energy consumption and an energy efficiency in the range of 10–20 %. A roller or blade spreads each new powder layer; blade-based systems often vibrate the blade to improve powder distribution.

1.3.4 Electron Beam Melting (EBM) – metals

EBM fuses metal powders using an electron beam controlled by electromagnetic coils, operating in a vacuum. The even temperature distribution during fusion results in very good strength properties, making EBM well suited for high-performance applications in aerospace and medical implants. Compared to conventional CNC machining of titanium, EBM at a 0.1 mm layer thickness can achieve comparable results in shorter lead times and with cost savings of up to 35 %.

1.3.5 Selective Heat Sintering (SHS)

SHS uses a heated thermal print head rather than a laser to fuse thermoplastic powder. This significantly reduces the heat and power levels required. SHS is primarily used for concept prototypes. A typical desktop SHS machine provides a build volume of approximately 200 × 160 × 140 mm with a layer thickness of 0.1 mm.

1.4 Jetting Processes

The jetting process family consists of three main categories: Material Jetting, Binder Jetting, and Multi Jet Fusion.

1.4.1 Material Jetting (PolyJet)

Material Jetting creates parts in a method analogous to a two-dimensional inkjet printer. Liquid photopolymer or wax is jetted onto the build platform via a continuous or Drop-on-Demand (DOD) approach, cured layer by layer under UV light. Support structures are printed simultaneously from a dissolvable material.

Material Jetting step by step:

  1. The print head is positioned above the build platform.
  2. Droplets of material are deposited onto the required areas using thermal or piezoelectric actuation.
  3. Droplets solidify and form the first layer.
  4. Subsequent layers are built up on top.
  5. Layers are allowed to harden or are cured by UV light; support material is removed in post-processing.
Material jetting process overview
Figure 9 – Material jetting process overview

Material Jetting produces near-homogeneous parts with excellent surface finish and is the main process enabling multi-material printing in a single build. Its key limitation is that parts are typically brittle and have poor mechanical properties compared to FDM or PBF, making it best suited to prototyping and visual models.

1.4.2 Binder Jetting

Binder Jetting uses a powder-based material (polymers, metals, ceramics, or glass) and a liquid binder that acts as an adhesive between powder layers. A print head moves in the horizontal plane, depositing alternating layers of powder and binder. After each layer the build platform lowers by one layer thickness. No support structures are required because the surrounding powder supports the part throughout the build.

Binder jetting process overview
Figure 10 – Binder jetting process overview

After printing, parts are in a fragile green state and require a post-processing step before they can be used:

  • Infiltration: the part is placed in a furnace to burn out the binder, leaving roughly 60 % porosity. Bronze is then infiltrated by capillary action, resulting in approximately 10 % porosity and good mechanical strength.
  • Sintering: the binder is similarly burnt out and the remaining metal particles are bonded together at high temperature, yielding less than 3 % porosity.

Both post-processing routes cause significant shrinkage: parts up to 75 mm typically shrink 0.8–2 %; larger parts average around 3 %. Non-uniform shrinkage must be accounted for in collaboration with the supplier. Even after post-processing, internal porosity remains – approximately 90 % density after infiltration and 97 % after sintering – so mechanical properties are generally inferior to fully dense DMLS/SLM parts.

Full-colour Binder Jetting is possible by simultaneously jetting ink and binder onto plaster or PMMA powder. The parts are subsequently coated with cyanoacrylate infiltrant and optionally an epoxy layer to improve strength and colour vibrancy. These full-colour parts are very brittle and not recommended for functional use.

1.4.3 Multi Jet Fusion (MJF)

MJF shares similarities with Binder Jetting – both deposit powder layer by layer and jet agents onto it – but works fundamentally differently. Binder Jetting uses a single adhesive binder to bind the powder layers together. MJF uses two agents: a fusing agent defining where material will melt and a detailing agent precisely defining part edges. Together, they cause the polymer chains within the material to entangle and fuse, rather than just bind, producing isotropic, functional parts with properties more comparable to injection-moulded components.

1.5 Directed Energy Deposition

Directed Energy Deposition (DED) is primarily used to repair existing components or to add material features onto near-net-shape parts. It also covers a range of related processes known under various industry names: laser engineered net shaping, directed light fabrication, direct metal deposition, and 3D laser cladding.

DED forms 3D geometries by melting material as it is deposited, using a focused energy source – laser, electron beam, or plasma arc – through a nozzle mounted on a multi-axis arm. The material is supplied in wire or powder form.

DED step by step:

  1. A 4- or 5-axis arm with a deposition nozzle moves around or above the target object.
  2. Material (wire or powder) is fed through the nozzle onto the existing surface.
  3. The energy source melts the material upon deposition.
  4. Successive layers solidify and build up new geometry on the substrate.
Directed energy deposition overview
Figure 11 – Directed energy deposition overview
FDM vs PBF vs DED comparison
Figure 12 – FDM vs PBF vs DED

1.5.1 Laser Metal Deposition (LMD)

LMD uses a high-power laser to melt metal powder or wire feedstock. It offers high precision, excellent surface finish, and the ability to deposit a wide range of alloys. LMD is well suited for adding local features (ribs, bosses, wear pads), rebuilding worn surfaces, and applying corrosion- or wear-resistant cladding layers.

1.5.2 Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing (EBAM)

EBAM uses an electron beam as the heat source and typically processes wire feedstock in a vacuum chamber. It is particularly suited to reactive and high-temperature alloys – titanium, nickel-based superalloys – where oxidation must be avoided. Deposition rates are high, often several kilograms per hour, making EBAM attractive for large structural components. All fixtures and components must be compatible with the vacuum environment.

1.6 Sheet Lamination

Sheet lamination processes bind and cut successive layers of sheet material to build a 3D object. The two main variants are Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing (UAM) and Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM).

UAM uses metal foils (aluminium, copper, stainless steel, titanium) bonded by ultrasonic welding under pressure, with intermediate CNC machining to create the geometry. LOM uses paper or polymer sheets bonded by adhesive; a laser or knife cuts the contour of each layer, and a cross-hatching method during cutting facilitates waste removal after the build.

Sheet lamination step by step:

  1. The sheet material is positioned on the cutting or bonding bed.
  2. The sheet is bonded to the previous layer using adhesive (LOM) or ultrasonic welding under pressure (UAM).
  3. The required contour is cut from the layer by laser, knife, or CNC machining.
  4. The next layer is added. (Note: steps 2 and 3 can also be reversed – cut before bonding.)
Sheet lamination process overview
Figure 13 – Sheet lamination process overview
02

General Rules and Guidelines

When designing a part for additive manufacturing, keep the intended production method in mind, as it defines the optimal geometry. Use the process selection overview and the per-process guidelines below to inform design decisions.

2.1 Material Extrusion (FDM / FFF)

The following guidelines concern plastic FDM printing. Metal material extrusion exists but is less common and not covered here.

2.1.1 Geometry and Feature Size

Table 1 – Geometry and feature size for FDM

AspectGuidelineWhy it matters
Minimum wall thickness≥ 2 × nozzle diameter (0.4 mm nozzle → ≥ 0.8 mm)
Thin walls may not bond properly, leading to gaps or delamination.
Overhangs≤ 45° without support; steeper angles require support structures
Unsupported overhangs sag because the extruded filament has nothing to rest on.
BridgesKeep spans ≤ 10 mm (material-dependent); use a low print speed
Long bridges droop as the filament cools before it can solidify.
Small details≥ 0.5 × nozzle diameter for holes/slots; larger for raised features
Tiny features can be clogged or incompletely formed due to extrusion limits.
Fillet radius≥ 0.5 mm (or approximately 1 × nozzle diameter)
Sharp internal corners trap material and cause poor flow or weak points.
Orientation-dependent featuresAlign tall, slender elements vertically to reduce support volumeReduces support material and improves surface quality on critical faces.
Maximum build envelopeUp to 900 × 600 × 900 mm on industrial FDM; desktop units typically ≤ 200 × 200 × 200 mmParts exceeding the envelope must be split and joined.

Warping is most common in ABS and Nylon. Use a heated enclosure, a brim or raft, and a higher ambient temperature to mitigate. Low-shrinkage materials (PLA, PETG) are less susceptible.

Material warping in FDM
Figure 14 – Material warping (FDM)

2.1.2 Part Orientation

Part orientation significantly affects strength, surface finish, and the amount of support material required. Key considerations:

  • Strength direction: FDM parts are strongest along the raster (extrusion) direction and weakest across layer interfaces. Align the primary load path with the raster direction where possible.
  • Support minimisation: Rotate the model to keep overhangs under 45°, limit contact points, and place the largest flat surfaces on the build plate.
  • Surface finish: Faces that require a good visual finish should face upward or be placed against the build plate. Support-contact surfaces always have a rougher finish.
  • Print speed: Orientation can influence print time but is usually a secondary concern.

2.1.3 Material Selection

Table 2 – Common FDM materials and their functional properties

MaterialTypical use casesKey design impacts
PLAPrototypes, decorative partsLow warping – can print tall, thin features. Limited to ~60 °C continuous service.
PETGFunctional prototypes, containersGood layer adhesion; moderate flexibility. Watch for stringing on tight corners. Up to ~88 °C.
ABSMechanical parts, automotiveHigher shrinkage – design larger tolerances, include draft angles, use a heated enclosure. Up to ~105 °C.
Nylon (PA)Gears, wear partsHigh impact resistance; requires generous clearances for moving parts. Moisture-sensitive – store filament dry. Up to ~50 °C.
Flexible (TPU / TPE)Seals, gripsRequires slower print speeds and lower retraction; avoid features smaller than 1 mm. Up to ~100 °C depending on grade.
Carbon-fibre reinforced PLA / PETGStiff, lightweight componentsMore brittle – avoid sharp corners. Higher nozzle wear; use a hardened steel nozzle.

This list is not exhaustive. Other commonly available filaments include Polycarbonate (PC), PolyEtherImide (PEI), ASA, and various composite grades. Consult supplier datasheets for specific mechanical and thermal properties.

2.1.4 Tolerances and Clearance

  • Dimensional tolerance: ±0.2 mm for well-calibrated printers; ±0.5 mm for less precise machines.
  • Moving parts clearance: Add at least 0.4–0.6 mm (≈ 1–1.5 × nozzle diameter) between mating surfaces.
  • Threaded features: Print threads as a separate insert (metal or nylon) or design them approximately 10 % oversized and tap after printing.

2.1.5 Supports

  • Support type: Use "tree" supports for delicate overhangs to reduce contact area and ease removal.
  • Support density: 15–30 % infill for most plastics; increase to 40 % for ABS or Nylon to counteract warping.
  • Interface layers: Add a few dense interface layers (≈ 0.2 mm) between the part and support to improve the surface finish where supports contact critical areas.

2.1.6 Print Settings That Influence Design

Table – Print settings and their effect on part design

SettingEffect on designRecommended range
Layer heightSurface smoothness vs. detail resolution0.1 mm fine detail; 0.2 mm normal; 0.3 mm fast/coarse
Print speedDimensional accuracy, stringing40–60 mm/s (intricate, older printers); 100–200 mm/s (intricate, modern printers); up to 500 mm/s for simple shells
Infill pattern and densityPart stiffness and weight20–30 % honeycomb for balanced strength/weight; ~50 % grid or cubic for higher stiffness
Shell wallsOuter strength, sealing≥ 2 perimeters for most parts; ≥ 3 for load-bearing walls. More walls generally add more strength per unit material than more infill.
Cooling fanOverhang quality, bridging100 % for PLA; 30–50 % for ABS/Nylon to reduce warping. Reduced cooling also reduces maximum bridge/overhang span.
Bed temperatureAdhesion, shrinkage control55–60 °C for PLA; 80–100 °C for ABS/Nylon; ~50 °C for PETG

2.1.7 Post-Processing Considerations

  • Sanding and smoothing: Design with extra material where sanding is planned (e.g., thicker walls).
  • Acetone vapour smoothing (ABS only): Avoid tight tolerances in areas to be smoothed; the process removes approximately 0.1 mm from the surface.
  • Annealing: Allow for dimensional change of up to 2 % after annealing; maintain sufficient clearance in mating features.

2.1.8 Common Pitfalls and Fixes

Table – FDM common pitfalls and corrective actions

PitfallSymptomFix
Warping / lifting edgesCorners curl up; poor bed adhesionUse a heated bed; apply brim/raft; increase ambient temperature; or switch to a low-shrink material (PLA, PETG).
Stringing on small featuresFine hairs between separated areasReduce retraction distance/speed; lower print temperature; enable "coasting".
DelaminationParts split along layer lines under loadIncrease extrusion temperature; reduce print speed; raise infill percentage; or redesign to align loads with the raster direction.
Clogged nozzleMissing sections, under-extrusionClean the nozzle; use filtered filament; avoid abrasive composites without a hardened nozzle.
Poor dimensional accuracyHoles too small/large; mismatched fitsCalibrate steps/mm; adjust flow multiplier; add clearance as noted above.

2.2 Vat Photopolymerisation (SLA / DLP)

SLA and DLP share largely the same design rules. Minor differences arise from XY resolution – projector pixels (DLP) versus laser spot size (SLA) – and the fact that DLP quality decreases with tray density.

Table 3 – Geometry and feature size for SLA and DLP

AspectGuidelineWhy it matters
Minimum wall – supported≥ 0.4 mm
Supported walls connected on at least two sides have a low warping risk and can be designed thinner.
Minimum wall – unsupported≥ 0.6 mm; add filleted bases to reduce stress concentrations
Walls connected on fewer than two sides have a high risk of warping or detaching.
OverhangsWithout supports: ≤ 1 mm in length, ≥ 19° from horizontal
Unsupported overhangs cause warping; with proper supports overhangs pose little issue.
Embossed details (including text)≥ 0.1 mm above surface
Features below this threshold are not reliably visible after printing.
Engraved details (including text)≥ 0.4 mm wide and ≥ 0.4 mm deep
Smaller features risk fusing closed during printing.
Horizontal bridgesKeep span < 21 mm (wider bridges must be shorter)
Wider bridges have greater Z-axis contact area, increasing the risk of print failure during peeling.
Minimum hole diameter≥ 0.8 mm in all axes
Smaller holes may close off during printing.
Clearance – moving parts0.5 mm clearance on all sides
Ensures freedom of movement and support material removal.
Clearance – assembly connections0.2 mm clearance; 0.1 mm for push/snug fitProvides consistent assembly fits.
Hollow section drain holes≥ Ø 3.5 mm; at least one hole per hollow section
Prevents uncured resin from becoming trapped inside, which causes pressure imbalance and part failure.
Hollow section wall thickness≥ 2 mmThinner hollow walls risk failure during printing.
Maximum build envelope~500 × 500 × 300 mm industrial; ~145 × 145 × 175 mm desktop SLALarger parts must be split into sub-assemblies.

2.3 Powder Bed Fusion

To accommodate shrinkage, most PBF designs have overall dimensions scaled up by 3–3.5 % at the pre-print stage. This does not eliminate the need for post-print finishing of critical surfaces. To reduce warping of large flat surfaces, add ribs for stiffness and consider part orientation carefully during design.

2.3.1 Minimum Wall Thickness

Table – Minimum wall thickness by PBF process

ProcessGuidelineReason
SLS0.8 mm (PA12) to 2 mm (carbon-filled polyamide)Prevents excessive warping or weak features.
DMLS0.5 – 1 mm (AlSi10Mg, 316L, Ti-6Al-4V)Metal powders fuse readily but thin unsupported walls still need support to avoid distortion.
SLM0.4 – 0.8 mm (Al, Ti, stainless steels)Higher energy density gives stronger bonds, allowing thinner walls, but residual stress can cause warping.
EBM0.8 – 1.5 mm (Ti-6Al-4V, Co-Cr)Larger melt pool and higher thermal gradients require slightly thicker walls for safety.
SHS0.8 – 1.5 mmBinder-filled powder behaves more like a polymer matrix; metal particles do not fully melt.

2.3.2 Embossed / Engraved Details

Table – Minimum embossed/engraved detail size

ProcessMinimum detail size
SLS / SHS> 1 mm
DMLS / SLM> 0.5 mm
EBM> 0.8 mm

Smaller features may be possible; discuss requirements with the supplier.

2.3.3 Text (Minimum Font Height)

Table – Minimum font height by PBF process

ProcessMinimum font height
SLS / EBM / SHS2 mm (font size 14); use sans-serif, ensure legibility in all orientations
DMLS1.5 mm
SLM1.5 mm (metal parts are often machined/polished after build; surface roughness ~30 µm Ra as-built limits effective minimum size)

2.3.4 Tolerances

Table – Typical dimensional tolerances

ProcessTypical tolerance
SLS / SHS±0.3 mm (or ±0.3 %, whichever is larger)
DMLS±0.15 mm (≈ 0.1 % for high-precision systems)
SLM±0.12 mm (≈ 0.1–0.2 %)
EBM±0.2 mm (≈ 0.15 %)

2.3.5 Feature Size (Pins, Protrusions)

Table – Minimum reliable feature size

ProcessMinimum feature size
SLS / SHS> 0.8 mm (polymer-binder limited for SHS)
DMLS> 0.8 mm (most alloys)
SLM> 0.4 mm (high-resolution systems)
EBM> 0.8 mm

2.3.6 Distance Between Parallel Features

Table – Minimum gap between parallel features

ProcessMinimum gap
SLS / EBM / SHS> 0.8 mm (to prevent bridging)
DMLS / SLM> 0.6 mm (to prevent balling)

For metal processes, features can be placed somewhat closer together, but ensure the gap is large enough for the powder recoater to fill the space completely. If the gap is too tight, voids or incomplete fusion may result.

2.3.7 Holes

Table – Minimum reliable hole size

ProcessMinimum hole size
SLS / SHS≥ 1.5 mm
DMLS≥ 1.0 mm
SLM≥ 0.8 mm
EBM≥ 1.2 mm

For metal PBF processes, holes can be smaller before they close off compared to polymer processes, as metal powders sinter more completely. However, unsupported vertical holes can trap unmelted powder; adding a vent hole or planning a "drill-out" post-processing step is recommended.

2.3.8 Escape / Vent Holes (for Hollow Sections)

Table – Minimum vent hole size for hollow sections

ProcessMinimum vent hole size
SLS / SHS≥ Ø 3.5 mm; at least one hole per hollow section
DMLS / SLM≥ Ø 2 – 3 mm (2 mm is often sufficient)
EBM≥ Ø 3.0 mm

For metal builds, powder removal is easier due to higher part density, so vent holes can be slightly smaller. However, thermal stresses in metal builds mean at least one vent per enclosed section is still required.

2.3.9 Maximum Build Envelope

Table – Maximum build envelope by PBF process

ProcessTypical build envelope
SLS~300 × 300 × 300 mm (desktop); up to 500 × 500 × 500 mm on industrial systems
DMLS250 × 250 × 300 mm typical; up to 400 × 400 × 400 mm on large systems
SLM250 × 250 × 280 mm standard; up to 500 × 500 × 500 mm on high-end systems
EBM300 × 300 × 300 mm to 500 × 500 × 600 mm depending on system
SHS~300 × 300 × 300 mm (similar to desktop SLS)

If a part exceeds the build envelope, split it into sub-assemblies and join them afterwards (welding, brazing, or mechanical fasteners). The same principle applies when the build volume cannot accommodate the required quantity of parts.

2.3.10 Materials

Table 4 – Materials for PBF printing

MaterialProcessCharacteristics
PA12SLS, SHSGood dimensional stability, wear and chemical resistance; widely used for functional polymer PBF parts.
PA11SLSHigher ductility and impact resistance than PA12; suited where toughness and elongation are important.
Glass- / mineral-filled polyamideSLSHigher stiffness and dimensional stability than unfilled nylon, but more brittle.
Carbon-filled polyamideSLSHigh stiffness, good strength-to-weight ratio, reduced deformation, lower ductility.
TPUSLSFlexible, elastomeric; suitable for seals and damping elements.
PPSLSLower density, good chemical resistance, good fatigue behaviour.
PEEK / PEKKHigh-temperature laser PBF systemsVery high temperature resistance and mechanical performance; specialist and less common.
316L stainless steelDMLS, SLMGood corrosion resistance, good ductility, broad industrial applicability.
17-4PH stainless steelDMLS, SLMHigher strength than 316L; suitable for heat treatment.
AlSi10MgDMLS, SLMLightweight, good strength-to-weight ratio, good thermal conductivity; widely used in lightweight structures.
Ti-6Al-4VDMLS, SLM, EBMHigh strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, biocompatibility; widely used in aerospace and medical.
Cobalt-chromeDMLS, SLM, EBMHigh wear resistance, corrosion resistance, biocompatibility.
Inconel 625 / 718DMLS, SLM, EBMHigh-temperature strength and oxidation resistance; suitable for demanding thermal environments.
Maraging steel / tool steelsDMLS, SLMHigh strength and hardness after heat treatment; suitable for tooling and structural parts.

2.4 Jetting Processes

2.4.1 Material Jetting (PolyJet)

Material Jetting produces near-homogeneous parts and supports multi-material printing. Its principal limitation is brittle mechanical behaviour.

Table 5 – Geometry and feature size for Material Jetting

AspectGuidelineWhy it matters
Minimum wall – supported> 1 mmMinimum wall thickness for major supported walls.
Minimum wall – unsupported> 0.5 mmMinimum for all other walls.
Pin diameter> Ø 0.5 mm
Minimum recommended pin diameter.
DetailsAs small as 0.25 mm is achievable
Material Jetting offers very high resolution for fine details.
Embossed / engraved details (including text)≥ 0.5 mm depth/height
Ensures small details are reliably visible.
Minimum hole diameter> Ø 0.5 mm; orient holes vertically where possible
Vertical orientation maximises hole circularity.
Clearance – moving parts / hinges0.15 – 0.2 mm clearance on all sides
Allows support material removal from gaps.
Dimensional tolerance±0.1 mm to ±0.3 mm (geometry and material dependent)
Sets the baseline for fit design.
Maximum build envelope~290 × 200 × 140 mm (contact supplier)Larger parts must be split.

Table – Material Jetting materials overview

Material categoryTypical applicationsNotes
Standard rigid opaqueHigh-detail, non-functional prototypesGenerally PE-like, brittle. Available in white, black, grey, blue.
TransparentClear prototypes and modelsCan be post-processed to full optical transparency.
ABS-likeParts simulating ABS propertiesHigher temperature range and strength; minimum wall thickness 0.85 mm. More brittle than FDM or moulded ABS.
Polypropylene-likeFlex and snap featuresExcellent for snap fits; more brittle than injection-moulded PP.
Flexible (rubber mimic)Gaskets, seals, overmoulds, buttonsCustom durometer blends available; not suited for high elongation/stretch applications.
High temperatureHot-air/water flow testing; up to ~90 °CRequires thermal post-processing to reach maximum heat resistance.
CastableInvestment casting patterns (dental, jewellery)Near 100 % burn-out; very high detail resolution.
BiocompatibleDental and medical applicationsDesigned for sterilisation and short-term biocompatibility.

2.4.2 Binder Jetting

After Binder Jetting, parts are in a fragile green state and require post-processing (infiltration or sintering) before use.

Table 6 – Geometry and feature size for Binder Jetting

AspectGuidelineWhy it matters
Minimum wall – supported> 2 mm
Ensures the part can be handled in the green state without damage.
Minimum wall – unsupported> 3 mm
Unsupported walls (fins, ribs) are at higher risk during green-state handling.
Unsupported edges< 20 mm in length
Longer unsupported edges are prone to breaking during green-state handling.
Embossed / engraved details≥ 0.5 mm
Ensures details are visible after depowdering and post-processing.
FilletsRadius > 1 mm on all edges where possible
Reduces risk of damage in the green state; aids powder removal from internal cavities.
Minimum hole diameter> Ø 1.5 mm
Ensures holes print successfully and can be cleared of powder.

2.4.3 Multi Jet Fusion (MJF)

MJF enables production of functional parts at reduced cost and lead time compared to SLS and injection moulding, especially for low to medium volumes.

Table 7 – Geometry and feature size for MJF

AspectGuidelineWhy it matters
Minimum wall thickness≥ 2.5 mmThin walls may warp, become fragile or break during depowdering and handling.
Maximum wall thicknessAvoid solid sections > 12 mm; use ribs or lattice structures insteadVery thick sections cool unevenly, causing internal stress, surface defects and warpage.
Minimum feature size≥ 0.5 – 0.8 mm for embossed/debossed details, text, ribsFiner details may not resolve reliably due to powder grain size and thermal effects.
Minimum hole diameter≥ 1.5 – 2.0 mm for through-holes; ≥ 3.0 mm for long or deep holesEnsures holes can be cleared of powder during depowdering.
Internal channelsMinimum channel Ø ≥ 3.0 – 3.5 mm; at least two escape holes per enclosed cavityEnsures unfused powder can be fully removed.
Powder escape holes≥ Ø 3.5 mm; use multiple openings for large/complex cavitiesSufficient vent size is needed to clear powder without damaging the part.
Overhangs and bridgesGenerally self-supporting; keep unsupported spans ≤ 20 – 30 mm where possibleLarge flat spans can warp or sag as the part cools, especially in thin sections.
Minimum gap / clearance≥ 0.6 mm for post-assembly; ≥ 0.9 mm for moving mechanisms printed as one assemblyPrevents features from fusing together or trapping powder.
Text and markingsStroke width ≥ 0.4 – 0.5 mm; height/depth ≥ 0.4 – 0.6 mm; use sans-serif fontsVery fine text becomes unreadable after depowdering and post-processing.
Maximum build envelope~380 × 285 × 380 mm typicalLarger parts must be split and joined after printing.
Slender parts (aspect ratio)Keep thickness ≥ 3 – 4 mm; add fillets and ribsSlender parts are prone to warping or bending during build and cooling.
Dimensional tolerances±0.2 mm for features ≤ 100 mm; add ±0.2 % of nominal above 100 mmSets a realistic baseline for fits; tighter tolerances may require post-processing.
WatertightnessWalls ≥ 1.0 mm for water-resistance; ≥ 3 – 4 mm for pressure-bearing features; use PA 12 powderThicker walls and correct post-processing reduce porosity and improve leak tightness.

2.5 Directed Energy Deposition

Because DED is often used for repair, the geometry and accessibility of the existing component strongly constrain what is achievable. When designing a new component intended for future DED repair, build in sufficient material volume and tool-access clearance around wear zones.

2.5.1 Laser Metal Deposition (LMD)

Table 8 – Geometry and feature size for LMD

AspectGuidelineWhy it matters
Typical bead width1 – 3 mm (single track)Defines minimum feature size, wall thickness, and machining allowance.
Layer height0.3 – 1 mm per layerToo small: slow build; too large: poor surface and layer bonding.
Minimum wall / rib thickness≥ 1.5 – 2 × bead width (typically ≥ 2 – 4 mm)Very thin walls are unstable during deposition and prone to distortion or collapse.
Maximum wall thicknessUse multiple passes or add internal cavities above 10 mmThick sections cool unevenly, increasing residual stress and risk of cracking.
Minimum feature size≥ 2 – 3 mm for stand-alone featuresSmaller features cannot be reliably controlled with the melt pool.
Machining allowance0.5 – 1.5 mm per side on critical surfacesCompensates for distortion, bead waviness and achieves final tolerances.
OverhangsPrefer build angles ≥ 45° relative to substrate; avoid flat overhangs without supportLarge overhangs are difficult to support with the melt bead and can sag or distort.
Minimum internal radius≥ 2 mm at cornersReduces stress concentrations and improves bead continuity.
Pocket accessPocket width ≥ 2 × outer diameter of LMD head; depth-to-width ratio ≤ 1.0; ≥ 10 – 15 mm radial clearance around melt pool areaInadequate access prevents proper deposition and shielding, leading to defects.
Dimensional tolerance (near-net)Typically ±0.5 – 1 mm before machiningReflects realistic accuracy of as-deposited geometry.

2.5.2 Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing (EBAM)

Table 9 – Geometry and feature size for EBAM

AspectGuidelineWhy it matters
Typical bead width2 – 6 mm (or more, system-dependent)Sets the minimum thickness of walls, ribs, and other features.
Layer height1 – 3 mm per layerLarger layers enable high deposition rate but reduce geometric resolution.
Minimum wall / rib thickness≥ 1.5 – 2 × bead width (typically ≥ 4 – 8 mm)Ensures stable builds at high deposition rates.
Maximum wall thicknessHollow out and add ribs for sections > 15 – 20 mmVery thick sections amplify thermal gradients and residual stress.
Minimum feature size≥ 4 – 6 mm for stand-alone featuresSmaller features are difficult to control with large beads and high heat input.
Machining allowance1 – 3 mm per side on critical surfacesCompensates for higher distortion and rougher as-built surface than LMD.
OverhangsBuild at ≥ 45° where possible; avoid long horizontal features without supportLarge flat overhangs increase risk of deformation and lack of fusion.
Minimum internal radius≥ 3 mm in highly loaded areasReduces risk of crack initiation in high-strength alloys.
Chamber limitsConform all parts to the vacuum chamber envelope; consider rotation/tilt optionsParts exceeding chamber limits or kinematics cannot be built in a single setup.
Dimensional tolerance (near-net)Often ±1 – 2 mm before machiningCaptures realistic capability of large-scale EBAM builds.

2.6 Sheet Lamination

2.6.1 Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM)

LOM is best suited to relatively large, simple geometries with moderate surface detail. Avoid features relying on high interlaminar strength. Thin freestanding elements and sharp re-entrant features are particularly difficult to produce reliably.

Typical design considerations for LOM:

  • Prefer broad, well-supported geometries; avoid long, fragile cantilevers.
  • Keep internal corners and transitions smooth where possible to reduce tearing and improve layer registration.
  • Account for the sheet thickness in the Z-direction; stepped surfaces become more visible on shallow slopes and curved surfaces.
  • Plan post-processing – sanding, sealing, or coating – when visual appearance is important.

Table 10 – Geometry and feature size for LOM

AspectGuidelineWhy it matters
Layer thicknessDetermined by sheet material; account for visible stair-stepping on shallow slopesVertical resolution is limited directly by sheet thickness.
Minimum wall thickness≥ 1 – 2 mm for non-structural models; more for tall or fragile featuresThin walls are prone to tearing, delamination, and handling damage.
Minimum feature sizeAvoid stand-alone features < 1 – 2 mmLimited by sheet thickness, adhesive spread, and cutting accuracy.
Minimum hole / slot size≥ 1 – 2 mm depending on material and cutting methodVery small features may not be cut cleanly.
Internal cavitiesKeep simple; ensure surrounding waste material can be removedClosed cavities may trap waste material that cannot be cleared after the build.
Corner radiiPrefer internal radii ≥ 0.5 – 1 mm where possibleSharp corners are more prone to tearing during cutting.
Application scopeBest for visual models, mock-ups, and concept verificationMechanical performance is limited by the laminated bond and material system.

2.6.2 Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing (UAM)

UAM (also called ultrasonic consolidation) bonds metal foils or ribbons in the solid state using ultrasonic vibration and pressure, with intermediate CNC machining to define the final geometry. It is particularly attractive for multi-material metallic structures, embedded sensors or wires, and parts with internal channels that would be difficult to produce by conventional machining alone.

Table 11 – Geometry and feature size for UAM

AspectGuidelineWhy it matters
Foil thicknessTypically 0.1 – 0.15 mm per layer; account for this directly in Z-resolutionVertical resolution and minimum step height are set by foil thickness.
Bonded contact areaEnsure sufficient planar overlap; avoid very small isolated bonding islandsReliable ultrasonic bonding requires adequate contact area and pressure transfer.
Minimum wall thickness≥ 1 – 2 mm depending on material and machining strategyVery thin walls may distort during intermediate machining or bond inconsistently.
Minimum feature sizeAvoid isolated metallic features < 1 mm unless validated with the supplierFinal resolution depends on both foil bonding and CNC finishing capability.
Internal channelsSize conservatively: ≥ 1 – 2 mm; ensure machining access during creationUAM is strong for embedded channels, but subtractive steps still limit achievable geometry.
Embedded componentsReserve at least several foil layers of cover thickness above embedded sensors, wires, or insertsPrevents exposure or damage during subsequent machining and bonding steps.
Ref

References

ReferencePurpose
ISO/ASTM 52920General principles and qualification standard for industrial additive manufacturing.
Additive Manufacturing Technologies, 2nd ed. – Gibson, Rosen, Stucker (2015)Background information on additive manufacturing techniques.
Hubs 3D printing design guide (hubs.com)Practical design guidelines for various AM processes.